The impact of speech disfluencies on the believability and recall of sentences
- Sarah Bibyk, Cognitive Science, Models & Agents, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, United States
- Lisa Fazio, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Duane Watson, Department of Psychological Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
AbstractIt is well-established that when people process sentences fluently, they are more likely to believe the sentences are true. It has also been shown that sentences which include disfluencies improve people’s memory for the sentences’ content. We sought to test whether both of these effects were present simultaneously. In Experiment 1, we found that speech disfluencies do not appear to always aid memory, but they do impact participants’ truth judgments. In Experiment 2 we found that this impact on truth judgments may not be due to processing fluency, but rather due to reasoning about the speaker’s certainty. We found a similar effect on truth judgments when participants were presented with sentences that were fluent but had rising (i.e. “uncertain”) intonation in comparison with falling intonation. In both cases, the effect was localized to only the sentences that had the cue, rather than to all sentences that the speaker produced.