Representational complexity and pragmatics cause the monotonicity effect
- Fabian Schlotterbeck, Institute of German Language and Literatures, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Sonia Ramotowska, Department of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Leendert van Maanen, Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Jakub Szymanik, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
AbstractPsycholinguistic studies have repeatedly demonstrated that downward entailing (DE) quantifiers are more difficult to process than upward entailing (UE) ones. We contribute to the current debate on cognitive processes causing the monotonicity effect by testing predictions about the underlying processes derived from two competing theoretical proposals: two-step and pragmatic processing models. We model reaction times and accuracy from two verification experiments (a sentence-picture and a purely linguistic verification task), using the diffusion decision model (DDM). In both experiments, verification of UE quantifier ‘more than half’ was compared to verification of DE quantifier ‘fewer than half’. Our analyses revealed the same pattern of results across tasks: Both non-decision times and drift rates, two of the free model parameters of the DDM, were affected by the monotonicity manipulation. Thus, our modeling results support both two-step (prediction: non-decision time is affected) and pragmatic processing models (prediction: drift rate is affected).
Return to previous page